E8Markets vs FX2 Funding
E8Markets and FX2 Funding are not the same product at different prices. Below is every term each firm publishes, side by side, and the differences that decide which one suits a given trader.
The difference in two lines: E8Markets is $34 cheaper at the entry tier ($16 with code E8 against $50). FX2 Funding publishes the wider maximum drawdown at $25k (10% on 2-Step against 8% on E8 Pro). Open E8Markets
| Term | E8Markets | FX2 Funding |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest evaluation | $16 code E8 | $50 |
| Size at that price | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 25k fee | $132 code E8 | $235 |
| Profit split | 80% / 90% / 100% chosen at purchase | 80% base, 95% add-on |
| Drawdown (25k) | 6% dynamic drawdown (trails closed profit), ~4% daily drawdown (E8 One) | 10% static, from the original balance, 4% of the higher of closed balance or equity at 5pm EST (2-Step) |
| Profit target (25k) | 9% (E8 One default; configurable 6-21%) | 8% then 5% (2-Step) |
| KYC | Before activation | Before activation |
| Payout rail | Rise Works / WorkMarket / Aeropay | Crypto to wallet / Rise bank transfer |
| Payout speed | On-demand; E8 One first payout from day 3 of the performance stage, then any time; E8 Pro daily | 48 hours, average 8 hours |
| Leverage | Classic markets: forex 1:30, indices/metals/energy 1:15, crypto 1:1. Perpetual futures: BTC 1:15, ETH 1:15, other crypto 1:2 | Crypto 1:2, FX 1:100 |
| Allocation ceiling | Unlimited challenge accounts; $500,000 max active performance allocation on E8 One | $300,000 |
| Instruments | Forex, indices, metals, energies, stocks, crypto (Classic); crypto perpetual futures on the Hyperliquid feed incl. BTC, ETH, alts, 24/7 | FX, metals, indices, energies and crypto CFDs |
Each drawdown above is the rule of the plan its own $25k fee buys. The rest of the ladder at that size: E8Markets: E8 Pro Perpetual at $74 (8% of room), E8 One Perpetual at $94 (6% of room) and E8 Pro at $104 (8% of room); FX2 Funding: 1-Step at $190 (6% of room) and 1-Step Pro at $260 (6% of room).
Which is cheaper, size by size
E8Markets is cheaper at 3 of the 4 sizes where both publish a price. Comparing the entry tier alone hides that: fee ladders do not scale at the same rate, so the cheaper start can become the dearer account.
| Account size | E8Markets | FX2 Funding | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5k | $16 code E8 | not sold | - |
| $25k | $132 code E8 | $235 | E8Markets |
| $50k | $202 code E8 | $465 | E8Markets |
| $100k | $342 code E8 | $925 | E8Markets |
What the fee buys, and what it takes back
Put differently, the difference is 0.8 more of the cheapest evaluation. The fee is also only the entry cost: at the headline split, E8Markets has to make $147 of profit before the attempt has paid for itself, and $247 at FX2 Funding.
| Measure | E8Markets | FX2 Funding |
|---|---|---|
| Fee for a $25k attempt | $132 code E8 | $235 |
| Fee per $1,000 of account | $5.28 | $9.40 |
| Profit needed to win the fee back at the headline split | $147 | $247 |
| Account destroyed on a bad day (drawdown in dollars) | $1,500 (6%) | $2,500 (10%) |
| Drawdown type | Trailing | Static |
Cost per $1,000, the break-even profit and the cost of 1% of drawdown are our arithmetic from each firm's published fee, split and limit; each drawdown figure is the firm's own percentage for the plan that fee buys, applied to a $25,000 balance.
The rule that ends most attempts
FX2 Funding measures drawdown from a fixed floor, while E8Markets trails it - so a profitable run can leave the second account closer to its line than the balance suggests. At $25k there is $1,000 more room at FX2 Funding ($2,500 against $1,500), which is 4.0 percentage points of the account.
Getting the money out
E8Markets pays Rise Works / WorkMarket / Aeropay, FX2 Funding pays Crypto to wallet / Rise bank transfer. Timing is not the same either: On-demand; E8 One first payout from day 3 of the performance stage, then any time; E8 Pro daily against 48 hours, average 8 hours.
Worth checking against your own cash-flow: a fast rail that pays into an account you then have to move is not the same as one that lands where you spend it.
Where they actually differ
- FX2 Funding advertises the higher split ceiling (80% base, 95% add-on).
- Payout rails are not the same: E8Markets pays Rise Works / WorkMarket / Aeropay, FX2 Funding pays Crypto to wallet / Rise bank transfer.
- clearing $25k means 9% (E8 One default; configurable 6-21%) in profit at E8Markets and 8% then 5% (2-Step) at FX2 Funding.
The decision rule
At $25k, if you routinely risk more than 8% of the account in a session, E8Markets is the one that ends the attempt, not FX2 Funding. If the first attempt is a test rather than a plan, E8Markets at $16 with code E8 costs less to be wrong about.
Which one, and for whom
Choose E8Markets if Traders who want a single-phase challenge at a low fee and intend to trade crypto perpetuals alongside forex, and who are comfortable with a Rise/WorkMarket payout account.
Choose FX2 Funding if Traders who mostly trade FX and want a cheap, fast-paying evaluation.
Both reviews carry the specific terms and the source pages: E8Markets review and FX2 Funding review. If a figure here has changed since it was read, email research@cryptopropfirms.com and it will be re-checked against the firm's own page.